De Jure Judicial Notice
Let All Men be Known by These Presents That:
On and for the record, let the record show, The Moorish Public Record, does herewith publicly proclaim:
A. The Moorish Public Record can competently recordate and publicly publish the matters set forth herewith
B. The Moorish Public Record has personal De Jure Judicial knowledge of subject matter contained herein this Notice
C. The Laws published within this Notice are true, correct, complete and certain, admissible as evidence, not misleading, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to the best of knowledge and understanding of the maintainers of the Moorish Public Record who established this public record in good faith and with clean hands.
The Moorish Public Record asserts that the minute an oath is taken as the CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL and said agent and/or officer, functioning as a CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL, receives any judicial notice or affidavit, it is recorded or put on display in the public. Should the CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL refuse to record or accept any lawful document once deposited in their custody or in the public refuse to accept, you are committing a crime against justice under Statutes at Large Sec. 5403 and it is punishable by up to a $2000 fine and 3 years imprisonment. If any CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL gives instructions not to record any documents from an indigenous, sui juris Moor/Muur/Maurikano, said clerk/agent/official receiving those instructions is still responsible, as any third party interveners are not accepted. Any CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL that has recorded an oath, must make that oath available for public access so that it may be viewed so that it can be made known to the people that the CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL is to be held accountable.
CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS or PUBLIC OFFICIALS, elected or assigned, or anyone from the lawyering craft are all third parties and do not have any jurisdiction to make a lawful determination in the matter of this Public Record as they do not represent any of the indigenous, sui juris, Moors/Muurs/Maurikanos, En Lex, CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER or PUBLIC OFFICIAL , do not have the authority to represent any Aboriginal Marshals Sui Juris En Lex. See Memorandum of Law that follows:
“There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is NOT bound by any institutions formed by his fellow men without his consent.” - Cruden vs. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70.
“All Sovereign, private civilian inhabitants shall have free access to all judicial courts en the several states. All clerks and / or deputy shall file all documents of paper for any and / or all-sovereign, private civilian inhabitants; free and without charge of fees.” -North American Republic Court, U.S. Supreme Court Side for LLC CASE's see - Crandall vs. State of Nevada, 73 U.S. 35 “INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES CONVENTION, 1989 (No. 169)” Adopted on 27 June 1989 by the General Conference of the International Labour Organization at its seventy-sixth session Entry into force: 5 September 1991 Article 8,
Denied A Right to due process of law: Such denials include(s), denying access to the multiple Constitutional rights and specifically acting against the Native ,Aboriginal, Indegenious, under a color of official right. It is a "taking action" denying the right to personal property violative of the provisions of the state Constitutional provisions and under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution for the United States.
Malfeasance Of Office: By such wrongful action, these individuals have acted with malfeasance of office in conspiracy with Agents of the deliberately; knowingly and willfully violating said rights are guilty of misconduct in office, whether public or private.
Slavery: The civil relation in which one man has absolute power over the life, fortune, and liberty of another. The Respondents have absolutely refused to communicate in GOOD FAITH with the Affiants. They have refused to disclose the lawful authority by which they act, the contract in default or the damages which they claim created the so-called liability.
Treason: Treason is defined as the assault against the authority to whom one owes allegiance. It is one of three specific crimes named in the United States Constitution. It requires that one commit an act of war against the Constitution, or giving aid and comfort to an enemy. Such clearly defined actions by government officers and such private officers who have privileged authority in commerce by the Constitution, in specific connection to the above violation, malfeasance of office along with violating their oath of office and in the related connected activities. Ones who do not affirm, asserted, or have not have an oath recorded in the office of the county secretaries of the state in which the are a constitutional officer or public official have willfully violated the basic fundamental principles this Country was founded on, and therefore condoned the acts of TREASON by so-called governmental officials against the Undersigned, making them liable for such acts of TREASON by refusing to stop such actions against Native Born, Aboriginal, Indigenious, Native, when they had the power and authority to do so after being noticed (criminally under Title 18, Section 4; civilly under Title 42, Section 1983, 1985, 1986).
Fraud: Permitting shown and demonstrated acts of fraud and actively participated in a scheming conspiracy of untruths and misrepresentations to deceive those who entrusted themselves in dealing in good faith, while specifically acting in deliberate bad faith when such fraud was shown (Cal Penal Code Sec. 532; 18 USC 1001).
Extortion: By such actions of Fraud, said Respondents under assumed (usurped) official right and color of office to demand, without any real lawful or proper authority, such misrepresentations and untruths to steal monies under a color and cover of law to raise revenue (Cal Penal Code Sec 518, 519; 18 USC 872, 873, 1951, 1962).
Racketeering: Is the combination of the above identified crimes. Title 18 United States Codes Section 1961 (RICO) defines it as involving a host of patterned criminal actions that includes but not limited to an act or threat of murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, and as in the instant case robbery, bribery, extortion, fraud, slavery, etc.
“He who defiles a decision interpreting the Constitution knows precisely what he is doing. If sane, he hardly may be heard to say that he knew NOT what he did. Of course, willful conduct can NOT be made definite that which is NOT defined. But, willful course, willful conduct can NOT be made definite that which is NOT defined, certainly are in NO position to say that they had NO adequate advanced notice that they would be visited with punishment.. When they act willfully in the sense to which we use the word, they act in open defiance or reckless disregard of Constitutional requirement.” Screws vs. United States 325 US 91, 65 S. CT. 1031, 89 L. Ed. 1495.” 42 U.S.C. ?. Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights “The appearance or ‘semblence, without the substance, of legal right...misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken ‘under color of state law.’”
“It is the duty of all officials, whether legislative, judicial, executive, administrative, or ministerial, to so perform every official act as not to violate constitutional provisions.” – Montgomery vs. State, 55 Fla. 97, 45 So. 879. “Public officials are not immune from suit when they transcend their lawful authority by invading Constitutional rights.”— American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO vs. Woodward, 406 F2d 137.
“Whoever under the color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any state, Territory, or District to the deprivation of ANY rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution of laws of the United States…shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both…” – 18 USC 242.
Hence, an "Affidavit" as defined by law is NOT pertaining only to real estate. It is a document of fact for the public record. An Affidavit is a written declaration or statement made voluntarily and confirmed under affirmation by both parties. Notices of Defaults may NOT be just a tax default, but a breach of contract that has nothing to do with real estate. Liens are filed and recorded against those who fail to perform according to the terms of their contracts. These Instruments, and many others, are recordable on demand. Failure to do so is a breach of contract and a lien-able offense.
Those in the employment of government who fail to conform to the specific performance of their duties may be liened by their failure to perform, even the forfeiture of their personal property. A government employee takes an oath of specific performance relating to the Constitution, as did their superiors. A government employee receives moneys from the public trust to perform what is lawful. Any breach of oath, government code, statute or the Constitution can be remedied by perfecting liens against those violating the law.
A government employees failure to record an instrument presented is causing damage. In such cases, athe County Commissioner(s) should be notified of the unlawful actions of a county clerk or government employee acting in such a capacity. If the County is notified of such actions and it ratifies or condones these actions, the County is establishing a policy to clearly violate established rights protected by the 4th and 5th Amendments of the Constitution for the Republic of the united states of America and as such these actions become a matter of "Conspiracy."
Conspiracy: A confederation of two or more individuals who may not know each other but, by their joint efforts, commit some unlawful or criminal act (Black’s Law Dictionary). Multiple officials, agents and other persons named properly noticed by the recorded COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVITS ON THE RECORD, and un-named who under a cover of official right and appearance and color of law continued to perform such acts to continue to raise revenue by fraud and extortion, for any so-called governmental function. (Cal Penal Code Sec. 182, California Racketeering Act — Cal Penal Code Sec. 186; 18 USC 241, Federal Racketeering Act, 18 USC 1961 et. seq.)